Building Trades, Features, Health and Safety, Labor News Briefs, Law and Politics, National

Federal Appeals Court Rejects Attempts to Weaken OSHA’s Safety Rules on Dangerous Silica

January 5, 2018

By Steve Wishnia and Neal Tepel

WASHINGTON—A top federal appeals court has unanimously rejected an attempt to weaken the Occupational Safety and Health

AFL-CIO President Richard Trumka in Brooklyn late last year.

Administration’s 2016 rule covering workers’ exposure to silica dust. A three-judge panel U.S. Court of Appeals denied all five objections to the rule raised by industry groups, including the U.S. Chamber of Commerce. The groups had asked the courts to review issues including whether limiting exposure to silica reduced workers’ risk of serious health problems, and whether the rule was technologically and economically feasible for the foundry, hydraulic fracturing and construction industries. “We reject all of industry’s challenges,” wrote the judges, who included Merrick Garland, President Barack Obama’s blocked nominee for the Supreme Court in 2016. A spokesperson for the Chamber of Commerce told the industrial-safety publication EHSToday that “we continue to believe that OSHA lacks substantial evidence to support its rule.” According to OSHA, more than 2 million workers a year are exposed to some level of silica particles 1/100th the size of a grain of sand, which can cause silicosis, an incurable lung disease. “We are proud to see these standards remain the law of the land,” said AFL-CIO President Richard Trumka.

Read more:

January 5, 2018

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.